Why ActiveState

Trusted Open Source for the AI Coding Era

ActiveState is the automated layer that makes AI-assisted development safe to scale, built on 25+ years of open source software supply chain expertise.

What Makes Us Different

Testimonials

“I don't have to think too much about security and the complications anymore because ActiveState does it for me.”

Stacy Leon

Sr. Technical Specialist, Siemens

ActiveState is so seamless that the business can function even with turnover and little training. The lights stay on and the engineers don't have to worry about what languages they are using to add value.

ActiveState Customer

FAQs

Still have questions?

Talk to our team.

Why would our security team trust this over what we control ourselves?

Control is exactly the argument. Right now, your security team is trying to enforce policy on an intake process they cannot fully see. AI coding tools are accepting dependencies faster than any allow list can keep pace with, and public registries are an active target for malicious packages. ActiveState makes your policy the catalog. Every component that enters your environment has been built from verified source code, scored for real-world risk, and attested with a complete provenance chain. When a regulator or auditor asks what is in your environment and how it got there, you have an answer that does not require days of archaeology.

Why do engineering teams adopt ActiveState alongside their security program?

Because this does not ask them to change anything. ActiveState integrates at the artifact repository level. Developers pull packages the same way they always have. AI coding tools suggest dependencies the same way they always do. The packages they receive have already cleared a security threshold before anyone touches them. What changes is not the workflow; it is where the accountability lives. Engineering stops absorbing the cost of every CVE that surfaces mid-sprint, and security stops being the team that blocks releases. That is a dynamic both security and engineering want to change.

How do security and engineering teams actually benefit from working with the same platform?

Today, most of the friction between security and engineering comes from timing. Security finds a problem after engineering has already built on top of it. The fix lands in the sprint as unplanned work, and the negotiation about what is acceptable to ship starts over. ActiveState moves that decision upstream. Security sets policy through the catalog before code is written. Engineering builds from components that have already cleared that policy. There are no surprises at release time because the governance happened before the build. Both teams work from the same source of truth, and the remediation conversation shifts from reactive to contractual.

What makes ActiveState the right choice over other vendors in this space?

Coverage, commitment, and tenure. Most vendors in this space secure the container layer, cover a single language ecosystem, or are still building out language support in beta. ActiveState covers 79 million open source components across 12 major language ecosystems, on Windows, macOS, and Linux, in production today. The remediation commitment is contractual: 5 business days for critical CVEs, against an industry average that lags 54 days. And ActiveState has been building this infrastructure for more than 25 years. The catalog, the build environment, and the remediation model were not assembled in response to a market trend. They were built specifically for the open source software supply chain problem. That is a meaningful difference when you are evaluating who to trust with this.

What happens when a zero-day drops in a widely used dependency?

If the component came from the ActiveState Curated Catalog, you have a signed provenance chain and a complete SBOM already on record. Answering "are we affected?" takes minutes, not days. If a community-approved fix is available upstream, the contractual SLA clock starts immediately: critical CVEs are rebuilt from source and redelivered within 5 business days. If your environment includes components outside the catalog, ActiveState's security feed operates independently of NIST NVD enrichment status, so your visibility into emerging vulnerabilities does not depend on whether NIST has completed their scoring yet.

Is this a realistic fit for an organization that uses multiple languages and operating systems?

Yes, and that is specifically where ActiveState has an advantage most vendors cannot match. If your development environment includes Python, Java, Go, Rust, C++, or most other major languages, and if your developers work across Windows, macOS, and Linux, ActiveState covers the full footprint. Container-focused vendors stop at the Linux boundary. Single-ecosystem tools leave every other language ungoverned. ActiveState was built to manage the actual complexity of enterprise open source environments, not an idealized version of one.

We already have a scanner. Why isn't that enough?

Scanners find problems after packages are already in your environment. Every finding they generate starts a clock: you now have documented evidence of a vulnerability you have not yet fixed. The better your scanner, the larger your documented liability. ActiveState works upstream of the scanner, at the point where open source enters your environment. Components that come from the Curated Catalog have already cleared a security threshold before they reach your pipeline. Customers typically see approximately 68% reduction in scanner noise after deploying the catalog. Your scanner stays. It just has a lot less to find.

See What Secure Open Source Looks Like

Try a free secure container from the ActiveState Catalog, or talk to our team about securing your open source supply chain.