Use this checklist to audit potential providers or to benchmark your own catalog’s feature set against 2026 market expectations.

Need to learn more about curated catalogs?  Read our primer blog here.

1. Security & Vetting Depp

Does the catalog distinguish between a “vulnerable library” and a “vulnerable library that is actually being called by the application code”? 

Are the packages continuously fuzzed for memory-safety issues and zero-days beyond just matching known CVEs?

When an upstream maintainer refuses to patch a vulnerability, does the catalog provider provide their own “hardened” and backported patch?

Does the provider analyze commit history for “social engineering” patterns (e.g., sudden changes in maintainers or suspicious code obfuscation)?

2. Supply Chain Transparency (SBOM & SLSA)

Does it provide a real-time, downloadable SBOM in CycloneDX or SPDX format for every package?

Are the packages built in a “hermetic” environment to ensure the code you download is exactly what was audited?

Does the catalog provide Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange (VEX) statements to reduce “false positive” alerts for your security team?

3. Integration & Developer Experience

Can developers search and pull from the secure catalog directly within VS Code or JetBrains without leaving their workflow?

Can the catalog integrate with CI/CD (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) to automatically block any package that falls out of compliance?

Does it include guardrails to prevent developers from accidentally installing non-existent or AI-hallucinated packages suggested by coding assistants?

4. Governance & Compliance

Does it provide a “Legal Verdict” for every package to ensure it aligns with your corporate risk tolerance (e.g., blocking GPL in commercial products)?

Does the provider provide a documented “Assurance Case” for each package to simplify federal compliance audits?